h1

Script Rewrite, New name

August 18, 2011

FilmRelics is undergoing a script rewrite.  It will still be about movies–the older, the rarer, the indie, the promo budget challenged. But good movies no one knows about or have been forgotten or shelved dont just come out of the bargain bin at a discount store.

In the last year, the Redbox has really taken off around the States. Yes, grocery stores had movie vending boxes for the last decade but they were 3 or more very small companies. You couldn’t check a central site to see where a new release could be picked up if your closest box didn’t have what you wanted,  and though they collected your email address they didnt let you know about what was coming on “new release Tuesday”, you couldn’t reserve movies at a box for pickup, and you didnt get texts for free movies via your phone. Redbox has changed all of this, added concierge type intelligence to the “rent something recent for $1 a night” video movie industry.

And then there’s Netflix streaming and Netflix. I find it interesting that so many movies are made that few people ever hear about, and when its time for the video to be produced, apparently some go to the bargain bin, some go to redbox, some go to Netflix. I dont think I’ve ever seen a movie in all three at the same time or within a few months of each other.  The big name predictable, forgettable drivel, like fast food, is readily available.

In using both these alternative movie services, I noticed they too featured unadvertised, unpromoted movies, and even had some older films readily available for no particular reason. If I search for movies that should be on DVD from my grammar school years though, there is no guarantee of their availability; passage of time seems to mean nothing. I find it a shame that someone’s creative work is often sitting in licensing purgatory where no one will ever see it, it had its chance apparently when it was released, game over.

It was part of my motivation for this blog to share movies I recall that have obviously faded into obscurity that have common threads with new ones that come out just so the licensing demons can’t claim full victory in their mission to kill creative work’s very existence as they have in the past. As means to rent have broadened, I realized I needed to change the scope and the whole approach for this blog.  I realized that my posts should be much shorter so you the reader, can go watch said movies instead of reading my diatribe and spoilers on them, it takes away from the whole point of even doing this blog.

So, anyway, a script rewrite and complete reimagining is underway. The name of the blog is also changing to “Stories We Tell Ourselves”, and Filmrelics will be a secondary title…

h1

A long road from Santa Fe*

February 28, 2011

Congratulations to all the Oscar winners this year. Firth and Bale have been in the game for 20 years or more and I remember a lot of their ’90s projects.

Anyway, Bale said something during his acceptance speech that captures what this blog is all about:”So many movies are brilliant and nobody knows about them…”

For Bale’s filmography, see http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000288/

*=The title of this blog post references the 1992 Disney musical film Newsies, which is the first I’d ever heard of Christian Bale.

h1

And here’s to you, Geoffrey Rush

February 22, 2011

Oscar night is this coming Sunday night. I am psyched that three actors I admire are in the running all for the same film, the King’s Speech, this year. TKS is also nominated as Best Picture. Looking back at all three careers–Bonham-Carter, Firth and Rush, you’ll find a lot of great movies about a wide range of characters.

But I thought I’d dedicate this post to Geoffrey Rush and dynamic character actors.  The main characters get a lot of attention, spotlight, not to mention the center of a story. But something I’ve come to realize with age and the more films I see is that there would be no story without character actors providing the framework–being the foil (bad guy), being a supporting contrast character, being a catalyst to what the main character experiences. If any one of these supporting cast members doesn’t “have their act together”, meaning he or she isn’t believable, it can ruin the whole story. If the audience is distracted by that one uncommitted actor, the story is lost. No one really  cares what happens to the hero at that point.

So, how do you know a great character actor?As a fan, I notice they stay busy because they love the job, and take on a roles for quality (richness of character) not quantity (how much screentime is involved); they keep getting called back by film creators because they’re damn good. These days, there are fewer boundaries between film, television, voice versus live action work. And all the better for someone who wants to play in all mediums like Rush.

For just a Rush sampler, check out this list:  schizoaffective pianist David Helfgott in the 1996 biopic “Shine”;  Nigel the heroic Pelican in Pixar’s “Finding Nemo”, Communist icon Leon Trotsky in 2002′s “Frida”, wicked Barbossa in the “Pirates of the Caribbean” franchises, financially-challenged theater owner Philip Henslowe in 1998′s “Shakespeare in Love”,  devious Walsingham consulting Queen Elizabeth in both Elizabeth films (1998 and 2007), and a not quite superhero, Casanova Frankenstein, in 1999′s “Mystery Men”.   (That’s range, baby).

In the past year, in addition to playing linguistics professional Lionel Logue in TKS, he provided the voice for Ezylryb in Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga’Hoole, and Ron in the Warrior’s Way. Prior to breaking into film in the 1990s, Rush had a 20 year career in Australian theater that continues to this day when he can schedule it between film projects.  Can you tell yet? This guy really loves his job, whatever person or creature that is right now.

For a full roster of Rush’s film and TV career, see this page:  http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001691/

This is only the beginning of the Supporting Cast Hall of Fame features on FilmRelics.

PS-Not that you need my vote or endorsement, Bonham-Carter, Firth and Rush, but I do hope you have trophies coming your way Sunday night.

h1

Black Swan, All About Eve, and Amadeus

January 10, 2011

Early last month, the much anticipated psychological thriller from Darren Aronofsky, “Black Swan”, debuted in US theaters.  Focused on the highly competitive world of the New York City Ballet, it is headlined by Natalie Portman,  Mila Kunis, Barbara Hershey and Winona Ryder. The internet was all abuzz for most of 2010 about Portman’s training for the role, and a steamy kissing scene she shares with Kunis.

Yet rivalry, especially rivalry among women, has been a juicy topic for films for quite some time. It might have started with 1950′s “All About Eve”, starring Bette Davis, Anne Baxter, Celeste Holm, and Thelma Ritter. Nominated for 14 Oscars, all four of  these actresses were nominated for their roles in this film.  There are no steamy female makeout scenes in this film (it was released in 1950, in the USA, after all), but you definitely notice what a caniving schemer disguised as biggest fan Eve Harrington (Baxter’s character) is through the course of the story.

When I think of other really good movies about jealousy and rivalry, I also remember Milos Forman’s “Amadeus”, released in 1984. It is based on the Peter Shaffer play of the same name that had been running on Broadway since the late 1970s. “Amadeus” is not an accurate depiction of Salieri, Mozart and how they related or felt about each other as professional composers in late 18th century Vienna, Austria; however, it IS highly entertaining as a rivalry story. Both the play and the movie are told through Salieri’s eyes, beholding Mozart’s phenomenal talent and being awed by it, and yet disgusted by Mozart’s silly playboy personality. How can such such brilliant talent belong to a brute? Salieri is tormented by the question of why God would bless an idiot womanizer with musical genius while he, Salieri, is well mannered but mediocre? In a funny case of art not imitating life, F. Murray Abraham won the Oscar for Best Actor for his portrayal of Salieri;  Tom Hulce, also nominated for Best Actor, played Mozart. To this day you can ask anyone who saw the movie whether they hate or love Hulce’s “Mozart laugh”, or even judge for yourself on Youtube clips  (PS-this blogger loved it).

I could probably write a whole blogpost (if not blog) about other rivalries, like love triangle movies–My Best Friends Wedding (1997), the recent Twillight saga (2008-2010), Phantom of the Opera (multiple versions since 1925), Gone With the Wind (1939), Casablanca (1942), Sabrina (1954, 1995) but that’s for another time.

What are your favorite jealousy or rivalry movies?

h1

The Namesake

April 8, 2010

You know, if I am going to develop a reputation on this blog for watching immigrant stories (“The Basket” before, the Namesake here) I will just say “guilty as charged”. One of the most interesting parts of the American story for me is that people chose to come here, and continue to choose to come here, to start all over again. It’s lovely when those stories are captured in print, film, or other media, albeit from the children’s perspective, not their parents who made the decision the journey, yet don’t understand why that’s a cool story to hear about. (For the record, there’s a lot of 3rd-7th Americans who won’t move out of their borough. ‘Perhaps it is generational.]
On with the movie already!
“The Namesake” (2007)  is a lovely film by Mira Nair, who gave us “Monsoon Wedding” in 2001, and most recently, “Amelia”.  “The Namesake” is based on a book (2004) by the same name written by Indian-American Jhumpa Lahiri, who has written several works on the Indian-American experience in the States.

The story centers around the Ganguli family–father Ashoke (Irrfan Khan), mother Ashima (Tabu), and their two Indian American children–Nikhil Gogol (Kal Penn) and Sonia (Sahira Nair). I will say this film doesn’t really let you in any one character’s head, you watch how things unfold among 3 generations.

When the film opens, Ashoke is riding on a crowded train after visiting family. He is reading his favorite author, Russian Nicolai Gogol when he is interrupted. An older man standing nearby advises him to travel. As the man takes a swig of his flask,  the train has a major accident. Ashoke thankfully survives, but his life is still changed from that incident. He goes on to marry  the lovely singer Ashima through an arranged marriage, and they move to the States–Cambridge, MA to be exact. Gradually they make  friends among other Bengalis in America, but it takes awhile. Ashima struggles with acclimating as a housewife, while Ashoke fares better, going to work every day and interacting with native Americans.

When their first child is born, there is controversy over what his name should be. Ashima wants a proper “good” name, Ashoke wants to name the boy Nicolai Gogol after his favorite author. Until the child is 6, he goes by “Gogol”. At 6, he is formally  named Nikhil, but will be referred to as Gogol for the rest of his life.  The name games and questions about what exactly a name means don’t stop for Gogol, though. In a few years, he is a rebellious teen just wanting to fit in here in the States. He thwarts his Indianness and rebels against his parents at all cost.  When his father tries to tell him the story of his name, Gogol is disinterested, tells his dad he already knows this, or has already heard it before.  Gogol goes to college, starts going by his first name as “Nick”, and dates a beautiful white blonde named Maxine (Jacinda Barrett).  Nick chooses to celebrate his birthday with Maxine and her family versus his own, but then a fateful phone call arrives.

It changes everything for Gogol.

That’s all I will say since the point is to see the film yourself.

TRIVIA:  It’s ironic Kal Penn was chosen to play Nikhil Gogol, because he changed his own name to get more roles in Hollywood. ‘Knowing Hollywood, this is nothing new for an actor to do—Italians have done it, Jewish people have done it, Germans have done it, just to name a few. ( ‘Really, Google real names of your fave black and white glam 40s-50s stars—none of them used the name on their birth certificate if it didn’t project the personality they were going for: Bob Hope, Lauren Bacall, Doris Day, Peter Lawford, Natalie Wood,  Mel Brooks) And yours truly thought up several pen names for her own work because she has an awkward-looking,  “has to be ‘demo-pronounced’  ” last name.
The Namesake http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0433416/quotes

Monsoon Wedding http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0265343/

Mira Nair  http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0619762/

h1

Crazy Heart and Tender Mercies

March 21, 2010

I saw Oscar award-winning “Crazy Heart” this weekend, starring Best Actor Jeff Bridges and Oscar-nominated supporting actress Maggie Gyllenhaal. A story about a 50-something country legend who never quite reached major stardom, I was reminded of two other pictures: one, I saw parallels between Bad Blake and Randy ‘The Ram’ Robinson  from 2008′s  “The Wrestler”; two, I thought of Robert Duvall’s “Tender Mercies” (1983), where Duvall played a country star down on his luck, finding new love and getting new chance to start over albeit late in life.  TRIVIA: Duvall also plays a supporting role in “Crazy Heart” as the bartender in Houston.

They’re both seasoned films I would recommend. For more information, see:

Tender Mercies http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086423/

The Wrestler http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1125849/

On an additional note,  the morning of the Oscar ceremony, CBS Sunday morning movie critic-in-residence David Edelstein listed his predictions for that night’s award winners for acting, directing, and best picture. He remarked that while the actors were likely to win that night, the award was really going to them for past work that the Academy hadn’t recognized the year it came out, some years have multiple great films, and the award can go to just one in each category.  Also, the list of great actors overdue for an Oscar is about as long as other American award organizations, for instance, the Rock n’ Roll Hall of Fame.  That’s a lot of years to give out consolation prizes; meanwhile, moviegoers are quick to assume a movie is the best that actor has ever done if he won the Oscar for it, and that may not be necessarily true. Like with” Crazy Heart”, Edelstein said the Oscars  tend to snub brilliant work in comedy, Bridges was getting an award for “The Big Lebowski” a decade later for a 2009 dramatic film, “Crazy Heart”; similarly, Sandra Bullock was getting an award for “the Blind Side”, but she had earned it over the years with her comic brilliance in “The Proposal”, “While You Were Sleeping”, “Miss Congeniality”, “Two Weeks Notice”,

Whether he meant to or not, I thought Edelstein was making a strong point by how important it is not to totally rely on awards to tell moviegoers what is worth checking out. He didn’t say where to look instead (in his commentary), so I will add my two cents. I would not be as familiar with the Coen Brothers body of work were it not for a friend named Scott who really loves offbeat films with rich characterization. I wouldn’t appreciate the therapeutic experience of seeing screwball comedies to laugh as much as possible were it not for Nicola. My friend Miranda and I caught every corset film Miramax had to offer in the 1990s.  And if it weren’t for non-profit film houses like the Roxy, the Terrace, South Windemere, and the Nickelodeon, my college days would have been riddled with more bland, predictable  and forgettable films.

With that life experience behind me, would think asking friends, most 20-50 year olds who like movies, checking out movieblogs (ahem), checking out the non-profit cinemas near you, checking out free showings at the library,  are all great places to start to find great films that just might change the way you see the world.

h1

The Basket

October 20, 2009

It’s October in the US, and that means Oktoberfest is in full swing here. This month there are two ethnic holidays, Columbus Day, intended to celebrate the discovery of the New World, and German-American day was on Tuesday, October 6. While Columbus Day was made national in 1934, German-American Day was made national in 1983.

What a good time of year to watch 1999′s “The Basket” starring Peter Coyote and Karen Allen. The title refers to two basket themes used in the film’s plot:  one, the basket used in basketball, and the basket referred to it Gerhard Muller’s opera, the Basket (Der Korb).

The story takes place in Waterville, a farming town just outside Spokane, Washington. Not much has changed in this town–there are about six families who all know each other, there’s  a central store run by Mrs. Haines, and the preacher, Rev. Simms, doubles as the town doctor.

The 20th century has brought rapid change even to these remote parts. WWI is underway. The Emery’s oldest boy, Ben, has just returned from the war with one amputated leg; any hopes his father had of his helping out on the farm are dashed. Rev. Simms has adopted two war orphans who had been living in a destitute refugee camp in Europe–Brigitta Brink, a lovely teenage brunette, and her younger tween brother, Helmut Brink. As you may have guessed, these children are German, and are trying to adjust as best they can to life in America and life without parents; this experience is not without its recurring bad dreams, loneliness, and guilt for surviving. Martin Conlon is the new schoolteacher, a Boston native who brings new traditions and interests to town.

The class is rowdy on Conlon’s first day. He soon realizes he can motivate this class, ages 8-18, by promising to teach them basketball and provide daily installments of his record Gerhard Muller’s opera Der Korb (The Basket). As the opera is sung, he describes what each character is saying; each day he plays about ten minutes, and always stops the story at a dramatic point to keep the sstudents eagerly anticipating the next installment. Given the limited entertainment in this farming town, this story captures the students’ imaginations, and outside of class, they can’t  help talking about it with their parents and other adults in the town, who talk about it amongst each other as juicily as town gossip. Some adults are excited and receptive to the story in spite of its origins and current world affairs; others are not so open-minded.

The main antagonist in the film is Mr. Emery, a farmer and father of four boys–Ben, of course, then Tom, Nathan, and Sam.  Seeing Ben return home handicapped was a crushing blow to running his farm;  understandably, he is very bitter. He takes his hostility out on the new orphans, Conlon, for his influence on Emery’s children and wife, and the fascination everyone in town has with basketball and this German opera story. Karen Allen  plays Mrs. Bessie Emery. While she is equally torn up by Ben’s wound and illness, she doesn’t retaliate by rejecting and hating everything German.  Ben and Nathan share their father’s attitude, Tom and Sam share their mother’s. This leads to many conflicts, within and with out this family.

Conlon learns about a basketball tournament against Spokane’s pro players with a huge cash prize; all he has to do is train the teen boys in his class to play in several months time.  Since there isn’t much to do other than farmwork, the teens don’t have a hard time breaking away to run to the schoolhouse and practice with a wire basket tacked to the side of the school building. But can they really beat the pros? Can it be that Conlon honestly wants to help the town out, or is he up to something?

This film does a great job of depicting an earlier, seemingly simpler time in American history, without glossing over its hardships and controversies.  It also deals with ethnic bigotry experienced by children (“of the enemy”)  in America, and illustrates the positive difference a teacher can make in children’s lives, especially children who do not have an easy time being accepted among their neighbors.  While the  story starts from Helmut’s perspective, that stops after the first few scenes, the story unfolds from no particular persepective from that point on. In additon to being a theme in the story, the opera’s soundtrack is used to mirror the Fluctuating emotions of the families and other characters.

Other Movies about inspiring teachers,  coaches, and other school staff include:  Dead Poets Society(1989)*, Mr. Holland’s Opus (1995)*, Stand and Deliver (1988)*, Mona Lisa Smile (2003), Remember the Titans (2000), Dangerous Minds (1995), Music of the Heart (1999), Emperor’s Club (2002), The Freedom Writers (2007), and Lean on Me (1989). I’ve starred a few of my faves in this list.

TRIVIA: The pledge of allegiance is recited in this film without the phrase “under God”, as was the case up until the 1950s.

When Brigitta goes to buy a basketball, Mrs. Haines refers her to the “amazon.com” of that era in the West, the Sears Roebuck Catalog.

STARS OTHER PROJECTS: If you wonder where you’ve heard Peter Coyote before, he has narrated a number of PBS specials and series, including the recent Ken Burns release, “National Parks: America’s Best Idea”,  in addition to acting.  Karen Allen was Marion Ravenwood, the bartender/love interest from the first Indiana Jones film; she was brought back for Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skulls. She was also in The Perfect Storm, Animal House, and East of Eden.

h1

Julie and Julia, Babette’s Feast

August 10, 2009

I had the privilege of seeing Julie and Julia the night it opened here in the States. I enjoyed it,  I was hoping to see more from the book make it to the screen that did not.  There’s a lot to cover in 2 hours–I guess involving all the people in the book would be far too many introductions to make, and the story centers on the two heroines. The language in the movie is much cleaner than the book, unless they redid the book to better match the movie. [As far as I know, they did not.]  I was glad they didn’t omit 9/11 references in depicting Powell’s job.

Anyway, as part of this new series on the Filmrelics blog, I searched my film memories for a wonderful older picture with a food theme. And that film would be Babette’s Feast. Directed by Gabriel Axel, released in 1988, Babette’s Feast is a Danish film with subtitles available in English, French and Spanish. The teaser info the premise centers on Babette’s arrival. But as I recall, the story starts at the home of two sisters, daughters of a puritan minister, who live modest lives together. One is very beautiful, the other a very talented singer.  Both women  have lived lives of self-denial as good Christians they feel they are expected to be–suitors and an opera company called, and the sisters declined.

Babette comes from revolution-weary France, seeking a more peaceful existence.  Again, being good Christians, the sisters oblige her. At some point, Babette wins the lottery and it is decided she  will return to France; her last night at the sister’s home, she cooks a lavish French dinner, far more elegant than the simple fish platters the sisters eat every day of their lives. The sisters aren’t sure they approve of this extravagance, but Babette really wants to thank them for taking her in in her time of need.

I won’t share anymore because I don’t want to spoil the whole story, but you see there’s a intriguing predicament there.  The story for Babette’s Feast came from the imagination of none other than Isak Denisen, who gave us  Out of Africa.

Other movies that deal with food and human conflict that I’ve enjoyed  are Like Water for Chocolate, The Joy Luck Club, Woman on Top, Chocolat, and Pixar’s Ratatouille. I know there are many more out there, but I haven’t seen them just yet.

For more information on any movie mentioned in this post, see the following links:

Julie & Julia http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1135503/

Babette’s Feast http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092603/

The Joy Luck Club http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107282/

Chocolat http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0241303/

Woman on Top http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0206420/

Like Water for Chocolate http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103994/

Ratatouille http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0382932/

h1

I Love You, Beth Cooper and Say Anything

July 23, 2009

Recently, in the United States a teen romantic adventure film called “I Love You, Beth Cooper” was released, starring classic all-american beauty Hayden Panettiere, and many actors I am not that familiar with. The film appears to take Coen Bros.-style wacky scenarios and pair them with “clash of the high school social classes”, a love theme that’s a little Austen-Wharton in its origins.  First, boy learns his crush isn’t a goddess, she’s human, then they both learn they aren’t that different, though they mingle in different circles. Could this happen at a real high school among graduating seniors? Possibly, once you’re graduated, you don’t necessarily have to try to make it work among the old crowds. But eventually, I think the two would find it hard not to go back to their old lives because it was comfortable and predictable, or because after graduation a person has a whole new life to try to figure out.

But I digress. My point in blogging is, I couldn’t help but recall “Say Anything” from 1989 when I saw the trailer for this new film. “Say Anything” involves a girl valedictorian from an upper middle class home, Diane Court (played by Ione Skye), and a boy from the fringes of her class, Lloyd Dobler (played by John Cusack).  Diane appears to have it all, and an even more promising future ahead of her. Lloyd, who meets her after graduation at a class party, seems like just the sort of guy to get in the way of that promising future, especially in the eyes of Diane’s dad, James Court (played by John Mahoney).  But not everything is as it seems, whether you’re talking about Diane’s image, or Lloyd’s for that matter.

The story has a happy ending, but it does involve Diane having a rude awakening and having to grow up from the idyllic, almost “modern princess” life she’d known up until her graduation.

I highly recommend this movie, and I’d like to think it wasn’t a story that you’d have to be a 80s kid to understand; and it’s not exactly like John Hughes Brat Pack work from earlier in the decade, though the characters are forced to confront reality, and learn to love it or just accept it.

For more information on both these pictures, see the websites that follow, and be all means, check out the films themselves.

“Say Anything” http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098258/

“I Love You, Beth Cooper”  http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1032815/

TRIVIA:  “In Your Eyes” was the love song Lloyd plays on his boombox for Diane, standing outside her window, wearing his trademark raincoat. This image has been imitated in all sorts of movies, tv shows, etc. The song itself is the work of Peter Gabriel, and was allegedly written about Rosanna Arquette.

Ione Skye is the daughter of 1960s Scottish musician Donovan Leitch. His greatest hits include  “Sunshine Superman”, “Mellow Yellow”,  and “Hurdy Gurdy Man”. One of his songs used in a couple US commercials lately is the love song “Catch the Wind”.  Wind energy, catch the wind, wow–clever, marketing guys! It is actually a lovely song, though.

h1

The Good Wife (1987) aka The Umbrella Woman

January 19, 2009

The back of the DVD box read something like this: What will this sweet housewife  do when she finds herself lustful for the new town bartender?

The above description missed the mark, to me,  about what the real themes of the story are: appreciating what you have versus what you don’t, appreciating what you have versus what you think you’re missing or have missed in life by making commitments when you did, and with whom you did. These are internal conflicts anyone can feel once they’ve made a commitment, for love or for money.  And in a marriage, if one partner reveals their doubts, whether discussing them openly, or behaving unusually, where does that leave the other partner? Is the relationship forever changed? Is that change for better or for worse?

The story takes place in Corrimandel, Australia, 1939. This is an area of flat land and a fairly sunny climate. There are small farms as far as the eye can see. Corrimandel  is a town of less than 1000, everyone knows each other’s business and casts judgement accordingly. Not much changes here. When it does, it can sweep some people up in its wake.

Sonny (played by Brian Brown) has a pretty  good life –a house, steady employment, and a beautiful, sweet-natured wife, Madge (Rachel Ward). His only stressor is his rebellious younger brother, called Sugar (played by Steven Vidler), who works with him and resides at his home.

Sugar , by contrast,  has a lot of growing up to do. He used to live in a boardinghouse downtown, but it didn’t last. Sonny let Sugar move in with the hopes that his example could rub off on the young man, but it doesn’t really work. Sugar sees his older brother as a boring, lackluster example to follow. Sugar wants status, the good life, women, but he expects to get away with reckless behavior and he squanders opportunities.

Sugar runs errands and helps with housework in addition to working as a lumberjack. Madge soon becomes his first crush. One night he spies (through the porch curtains) Sonny and Madge making love. Within days, Sugar boldly asks Madge why can’t they do the same? Madge coyly responds with another question, but knows exactly what he’s asking about.  She may even be a little gleeful that someone besides Sonny finds her attractive. She tells Sugar that he should ask Sonny if it’s okay for their rendezvous, she’s indifferent, and that all men are the same, they like to think their different, but they aren’t. (These ideas come back later).

Sugar confronts Sonny a minute later, Madge follows him.  Sugar asks if he can have sex with Madge. Sonny asks how Madge felt, Madge claims to have said nothing. Sugar counters, Oh no she didn’t, she said all men are the same.  Sonny, not visibly angry or disturbed by this conversation, tells Madge that if that’s the way you feel, then go ahead and find out if that’s true. She steps into the bedroom with Sugar. Once they are undressed, he reaches climax almost immediately.

Madge talks with Sonny after her encounter.  He asks well, what do you think now? She admits it wasn’t that great, and she still loves him (Sonny) more than anyone else.  There’s the false assurance that this disappointment may have taught her something, but it didn’t. Sonny can tell Madge has grown dissatisfied with her current life, and he lets her make her own mistakes. He is a steady presence, is truly dedicated to Madge, and doesn’t react violently to her wandering. Madge admits later that she doesn’t deserve Sonny’s love, he reminds her that he has no one else to give it to.

Unlike his brother and her husband, Sugar feels no loyalty or sense of obligation to anyone but himself. Sugar publicly lets it slip that he’s seen Madge nude and they had sex at least once.  The first time it happens, Madge is there and instantly humiliated, she runs out of the ladies store where she was trying on dresses.  Unfortunately, it becomes an endless topic for ridicule among townsfolk. Townsfolk who turn out to be hypocrites with their infidelities, but the point driven home is this–you can misbehave, but as long as its not publicized, and its not with another town  regular, its allowable. No one’s talking because chances are, they’re in on the same game.

A new bartender arrives in town to work at the hotel bar. This man, Neville Griffith (played  by Sam Neill), is an object of fascination for both Madge and Sugar. Both are very naive and not the best judges  of character; their relations with Neville reveal that. Madge’s first meeting with Neville occurs when he arrives at the train station. She happens to be walking by; she is carrying her parasol and looking elegant. Neville embraces Madge forcefully and tells her to meet up with him later at the hotel. Madge rejects him.  Neville accepts a car ride from his new boss, the hotel owner, and tells Madge she only gets one chance with him. This plants a seed in Madge’s mind that she might have another chance, when Neville meant quite the opposite. She starts dressing sexier, wearing more bold colors, and going to town more, and drinking alcohol. If Neville appears anywhere, she sees him, then pretends not to notice. Neville, meanwhile, is busy trying to seduce every 18-35 year old in town, married or not. He becomes a bit of a celebrity, and is amused by it.

One afternoon, Madge is waiting at the hotel door to watch him.  Neville, sauntering in with his latest conquest, tells her–”I told you. You aren’t as special as you think you are.” Madge is undaunted, she doesn’t seem to grasp the karma in this statement: Neville’s told her what she basically told Sonny (via Sugar) that night awhile back. It isn’t until Neville is forced out of town and she attempts to follow that Madge is forced to accept the life she has instead of one that seemed so tantalizing.

Neville also became on object of fascination for Sugar. His romances, his stories, and his fistfighting skills with drunks made him a legend in the younger man’s eyes.  Neville is amused by Sugar’s admiration. Sugar is amused to hear Neville call Madge a *itch and an object of pity for being obsessed with him. Sugar learns later that he too is seen as pathetic by this hero of his, and that stings. Sugar, never really loyal to anyone but himself, decides to foil Neville’s final and biggest conquest yet: Mrs. Fielding, a rich man’s wife.

Sure enough, Mr. Fielding shows up that same evening to retrieve his wife  and inform Neville he has a paid one way train ticket out of town.  Neville knows exactly who tattled, but lackadasically brushes the local dust of his feet. He heads to a new town and surely, a new set of women seeking his charm and affections.

Sugar goes home to Sonny and reiterates, verbatim, what Neville said about Madge. Sugar naively talks to his brother as if he were Neville, and gets a rude awakening. Sonny gives his brother the beating of his life, and throws him out on his ear, he tells Sugar he never wants to see him ever again and doesn’t care what happens to him. Sugar disappears into the darkness with only the clothes on his back.

Additional notes: The only reminders that it is the 1930s is the ladies fashion, their wavy bob hairdos, and the jazz music played when the family heads to the town hotel for a night out. The rest of the soundtrack is sci-fi sounding keyboards. Perhaps it is meant to hint at Rachel’s inner wistful world, not happy with her life, yearning for the future.  (The shopgirl featured in the movie seemed to be wearing more eye makeup, which was contemporary for  the 1980s.) Or, the music was intended solely to create mood for the story, without adhering to what music was available or popular at the time of the story. Ideally, a film picks one music concept and commits to it, though. Case in point: Dirty Dancing, great film, awesome soundtrack of 1960s oldies. Except it wasn’t 100% oldies–”Time of My Life” and “Yes!We’re Gonna Make Love” were contemporary tracks, not even trying for a retro 1960s sound. It can really annoy music buffs to fast forward 2 decades in a matter of minutes.

Other films that explore the unfulfilled housewife and how she reconciles these feelings (or not): The Bridges of Madison County, The Hours, Far From Heaven, Pleasantville. Foreign Films: Belle du Jour (France), Dark Night (Taiwan). This is by no means a complete list.

Pure trivia: Brian Brown and Rachel Ward are married in real life, and have been for years.

The USA also has a contemporary show called “Desperate Housewives”, the first six seasons are available on DVD, this spawned reality series like “Real Housewives of (insert county).”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.